Yajurveda 40.10: The True Nature of God Revealed by Dhiranaam


Your Guide to Spiritual Text, Ancient Wisdom, and Moksha

Yajurveda Adhyay 40, Mantra 10: The Confusion Over God’s Nature & The True Revelation of Dhiranaam

Across human history, religious scholars, philosophers, and seekers have been divided over the fundamental nature of the Creator. One school of thought asserts that God takes physical birth as an incarnation (Sambhavat), while another firmly argues that God is strictly unmanifest and unborn (Asambhavat).

In Yajurveda Adhyay 40, Mantra 10, the knowledge-giver of the Vedas (Brahm / Kaal) addresses this deep-seated debate. The verse explicitly declares that both popular opinions fail to capture the whole truth. Instead, the actual, complete knowledge regarding the true nature of God can only be understood through a Dhir (धीराणाम् / Dhiranaam)—an enlightened, complete Tatvadarshi Sant.


1. Original Verse and Transliteration

Sanskrit Verse: अन्यदेवाहूः सम्भवादन्त्याहुर सम्भवात् । इति शुश्रुम धीराणां ये नस्तद्विचचक्षिरे ॥ १० ॥

Transliteration: Anyat Eva Auhuh Sambhavad-iti sam-bhavat Anyat Auhuh Asambhavad-iti asam-bhavat  Iti Sushruma Dhiranaam Ye Nah Tat Vichachakshire iti vi-chachaksire || 10 ||


2. Word-by-Word Breakdown & Translation

Scriptural Terms and Meaning:

  • Anyad Eva Auhuh Sambhavat (अन्यत् एव आहुः सम्भावात्): Some people say that the ultimate reality or divine result is attained through worship of the manifested/incarnated form (Sambhavat).
  • Anyat Auhuh Asambhavat (अन्यत् आहुः असम्भावात्): Others state that the result is attained through worship of the unmanifested/unborn form (Asambhavat).
  • Iti Sushruma Dhiranaam (इति शुश्रुम धीराणाम्): Thus we have heard from the wise, enlightened, and steady saints (Dhiranaam).
  • Ye Nah Tat Vichachakshire (ये नः तत् विचचक्षिरे): Those who have clearly explained, decoded, and imparted that complete knowledge (Tatvgyan) unto us.

3. Practical Meaning and Theological Analysis

A. The Conflict of Worldly Opinions: Birth vs. Unborn

The Speaker of the Vedas points out that common human understanding is trapped in a false binary:

  1. The Sambhavat Theory (Incarnation View): Believing that God takes physical birth from a mother's womb, matures, undergoes aging, and dies.
  2. The Asambhavat Theory (Formless/Unborn View): Believing that God is purely formless (Nirakar), light-only, or non-existent in any tangible body.

The mantra uses the phrase Anyad-Eva ("it is entirely different") to state that both of these conventional theories are incomplete. Supreme God does not take biological birth from a womb like a ordinary mortal (Avyabhichari), nor is He a formless void (Nirakar).

B. The Revealed Reality: God Manifests Without Mother's Womb

As corroborated by Rigveda 9.96.17, Rigveda 9.82.1, and Samveda 1400, Supreme God Kavir Dev (God Kabir) possesses a luminous body in Satlok. When He descends to Earth:

  • He appears directly as an extraordinary infant (Shishum Jgyanam) without biological birth.
  • He grows up through His own divine play (Leela), assuming the form of a saint or poet.
  • Thus, He is self-existent and immortal (Asambhavat in terms of mortal birth), yet possesses a visible form (Sambhavat in terms of manifestation).

C. The Absolute Need for a Dhir (Tatvadarshi Sant)

The second line—Iti sushruma dhiranaam ye nah tat vichachakshire—is a direct scriptural command:

  • Worldly scholars and commentators who rely on intellectual guesswork cannot clarify the real nature of God.
  • Only a true, patient, self-realized spiritual guide—a Dhir (Tatvadarshi Sant) as described in Bhagavad Gita 4.34 and 15.1—possesses the full key (Tatvgyan) to decode these Vedic mysteries and impart authentic worship (Om-Tat-SatGita 17.23).

4. Harmony with Complementary Vedic and Gita Passages

Scripture Reference Connection to Yajurveda 40.10
Yajurveda 40.13 Reaffirms Iti sushruma dhiranaam, applying the exact same principle to the results of true vs. false worship.
Bhagavad Gita 4.34 Instructs seekers to prostrate before and learn from a Tatvadarshi Sant who knows the actual truth (Tatvgyan).
Bhagavad Gita 15.1 Defines the true master (Vedavit) as the one who explains every part of the Inverted Tree of Creation.
Rigveda 9.96.17 Provides the exact details of God Kabir's child-manifestation (Shishum) that resolves the Sambhavat/Asambhavat debate.

Summary

Yajurveda Adhyay 40, Mantra 10 establishes that popular religious debates over whether God is incarnated (Sambhavat) or formless/unborn (Asambhavat) are based on incomplete understanding.

The Vedic text explicitly declares that the true nature of the Creator is entirely different (Anyad) from worldly assumptions, and that this distinct knowledge (Tatvgyan) can only be received from Dhiranaam—a genuine, complete Tatvadarshi Sant.


Related Topics

We use our own or third party cookies to improve your web browsing experience. If you continue to browse we consider that you accept their use.  Accept