Across human history, religious scholars, philosophers, and seekers have been divided over the fundamental nature of the Creator. One school of thought asserts that God takes physical birth as an incarnation (Sambhavat), while another firmly argues that God is strictly unmanifest and unborn (Asambhavat).
In Yajurveda Adhyay 40, Mantra 10, the knowledge-giver of the Vedas (Brahm / Kaal) addresses this deep-seated debate. The verse explicitly declares that both popular opinions fail to capture the whole truth. Instead, the actual, complete knowledge regarding the true nature of God can only be understood through a Dhir (धीराणाम् / Dhiranaam)—an enlightened, complete Tatvadarshi Sant.
Sanskrit Verse: अन्यदेवाहूः सम्भवादन्त्याहुर सम्भवात् । इति शुश्रुम धीराणां ये नस्तद्विचचक्षिरे ॥ १० ॥
Transliteration: Anyat Eva Auhuh Sambhavad-iti sam-bhavat Anyat Auhuh Asambhavad-iti asam-bhavat Iti Sushruma Dhiranaam Ye Nah Tat Vichachakshire iti vi-chachaksire || 10 ||
The Speaker of the Vedas points out that common human understanding is trapped in a false binary:
The mantra uses the phrase Anyad-Eva ("it is entirely different") to state that both of these conventional theories are incomplete. Supreme God does not take biological birth from a womb like a ordinary mortal (Avyabhichari), nor is He a formless void (Nirakar).
As corroborated by Rigveda 9.96.17, Rigveda 9.82.1, and Samveda 1400, Supreme God Kavir Dev (God Kabir) possesses a luminous body in Satlok. When He descends to Earth:
The second line—Iti sushruma dhiranaam ye nah tat vichachakshire—is a direct scriptural command:
| Scripture Reference | Connection to Yajurveda 40.10 |
|---|---|
| Yajurveda 40.13 | Reaffirms Iti sushruma dhiranaam, applying the exact same principle to the results of true vs. false worship. |
| Bhagavad Gita 4.34 | Instructs seekers to prostrate before and learn from a Tatvadarshi Sant who knows the actual truth (Tatvgyan). |
| Bhagavad Gita 15.1 | Defines the true master (Vedavit) as the one who explains every part of the Inverted Tree of Creation. |
| Rigveda 9.96.17 | Provides the exact details of God Kabir's child-manifestation (Shishum) that resolves the Sambhavat/Asambhavat debate. |
Yajurveda Adhyay 40, Mantra 10 establishes that popular religious debates over whether God is incarnated (Sambhavat) or formless/unborn (Asambhavat) are based on incomplete understanding.
The Vedic text explicitly declares that the true nature of the Creator is entirely different (Anyad) from worldly assumptions, and that this distinct knowledge (Tatvgyan) can only be received from Dhiranaam—a genuine, complete Tatvadarshi Sant.